In the last months, as I have started my PhD focusing on
social work in Brazil, I have more frequently been challenged to answer the
above question. Well, to be honest I would rather turn the question around. Why
should we not look outside Norway and in particular to Brazil?
First of all I believe that Norwegian researchers within the
health- and social sciences will benefit from studying the professional
practices of health- and social services outside the Scandinavian social,
cultural, political and economic context. In the process of increasing
international and intercultural interaction in general, the meanings and
pre-established and shared understanding of norms, values and morale are
challenged.
On one side we are more frequently meeting people in our
societies that view e.g. relationships between the public and the private,
between welfare systems and family and different sets of moral universes that
are different from the basis of our own juridical and political systems.
Understanding these differences (and also maybe reflect slightly on whether we
really are as uniform as we like to present ourselves) might lead to better
knowledge about the successes and shortcomings of our own health- and social
services.
On the other hand, Norway has during the last decades
expanded its international activities. Social workers are participating in
international programs and we find ourselves conducting health- and social work
in societies quite different from our own. In doing this, we need to be aware
that we bring with us knowledge, principles and values that are to a large
degree developed in our specific social, cultural, economic and political
context. This knowledge meets other kinds of knowledge in international health-
and social work. Through research, we may make explicit the traditions and
values that are inherent in the way we conduct health- and social work, and who
knows- maybe we discover better ways of conducting our profession also in
Norway?
So why is Brazil in particular interesting?
Brazil has in the last decade risen to become the 6th
largest economy of the world and is becoming more and more dominant in
international interaction. It is
definitely putting to shame the classical phrase of the French president Charles
de Gaulle: Le Brésil n’est pas um pays sérieux (Brazil is not a serious
country), and I find it safe to say that the Brazil we are now witnessing, is in
economic terms nothing like the Brazils of the past.
So, Brazil is becoming a major actor on the international
scene with a growing worldwide influence. But if we look to the public health-
and social services in Brazil, there is an enormous gap between the realities
in this sector in Norway and Brazil. With high differences in relative spending
on health- and social services per capita in the two nations, one is inclined
to conclude that Brazil has a lot to learn from Norway. And indeed, there is a
lot to support such a stance. However, I fear that one might run the risk of
missing important aspects by declaring such a position in the perspective on
the relationship between Norway and Brazil.
Brazil has for the last 30-40 years developed their
Sanatarian Reform, leading to the constitution of 1988 guaranteeing civic
rights related to health and social security. From this they have developed
organizational frameworks like the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de
Saúde- SUS) and the Unified Social Services (Sistema Único de Assistencia
Social- SUAS) and several large scale social programs like the Family Grant (Bolsa
da Familia) and the Family Health Program (Programa de Saúde da Família). In
this, the Brazilian state has over the decades been developing ambitions to
establish a welfare system that in it’s values is recognizable to the
principles of the Norwegian welfare system.
We may learn from Brazil in two manners. Firstly, it is the
obvious potential of learning from their experiences in multi professional
practice. In programs like the Family Health Program, they are working with
community health in multi professional teams quite different from experiences
in Norway. This could benefit our own knowledge about preventive initiatives
and community health in Norway. Secondly, as Norwegian businesses are
intensifying their involvement in Brazil, they will also be participating in
Corporate Social Responsibility projects of different kinds. By participating
in this with our professional competence and being sensitive to the cultural,
social, bureaucratic, organizational, economic and/or political foundations of
Brazil, we might contribute, if not to success, at least to avoid negative and
destructive influences in social engagement.
So- Brazil is important. We need professional reflection and
research to be able to learn from this emerging and developing relationship
between our two nations, and to be able to influence this process in positive
ways. Therefore, we should be interested not only in international research,
but in particular international research related to Brazil.
I have to admit I'm quite surprised and maybe a little bit disappointed to hear that you repeatedly have been faced with questions concerning why Norwegian researchers should look elsewhere to shed light on our own practices. One would think that the answer is a given. Nevertheless, in some ways I am still glad you get the question. Firstly, it goes to show that people care about your project, and it gives you an opportunity to communicate the importance of international comparisons. Secondly, it gave you the chance to write this great blog post. Your phd project is really interesting, and I am looking forward to keeping track of it the coming years. I hope you will enlighten us here on the blog with frequent postings!
SvarSlettThank you, and I may give you some comfort here. Most questions (all actually) are asked with a courious non-critacal antutude, simply wanting to know why Brazil is interesting in this perspective. My emphasis on international cooperation in general, is more a question of my rethorics, trying to frame cooperation with Brazil in a wider context, pointing to aspects that I guess the reader agrees on, before I take this to Brazil in particular:-)
SvarSlett